Making Camp: Rhetorics of Transgression in U.S. Popular Culture (Albma Rhetoric Cult & Soc Crit)
Helene A. Shugart
Language: English
Pages: 200
ISBN: B00SWPKS8E
Format: PDF / Kindle (mobi) / ePub
Hillbilly: A Cultural History of an American Icon
London Labour and the London Poor (Oxford World's Classics)
An End to Poverty?: A Historical Debate
Losers: The Road to Everyplace but the White House
Communication Across Cultures: Mutual Understanding in a Global World (2nd Edition)
The New Yorker (March 14 2016)
That camp is the gay sensibility; camp is an invasion and subversion of other sensibilities” (pp. 224–225). Because camp is so closely aligned with gay male subculture(s), often manifest in those contexts as drag—and several critics, as noted above, assert that its predilection for taking the feminine as its object reflects misogynist attitudes—the relationship between women as subjects, camp, and performance has not received extensive scholarly treatment. Although she does not utilize camp as a.
Camp irony with a specifically gay sensibility: “At the core of this perception of incongruity is the idea of gayness as a moral deviation. . . . The inner knowledge of our unique social situation has produced in us a heightened awareness of the discrepancies that lie between appearance and reality, expression and meaning” (p. 120). In terms of its function, camp, asserts Flinn (1999), turns on the “reconYou are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any.
Scholars have noted, and as we have reiterated in this study, irony is a critical, defining feature of camp (Babuscio, 1999; Case, 1999; Flinn, 1999; Newton, 1972; Sontag, 1964). That is, camp turns on “incongruous juxtapositions” (Newton, 1972, p. 103) and the “recontextualization of signs” (Flinn, 1999, p. 440), inviting and arguably prompting the audience to engage the incongruity in a way that demands participation to secure the camp sensibility. What distinguishes camp from conventional.
Artifacts, as they may well be more nuanced than cultural critics might presume, on all sides of the debate. In the case of these camp performances, the very rhetorical devices that define the context of constraint in which these performances occur constitute the premises for the resistance available in those texts: they are merely configured in distinctive ways so as to articulate a contrary discursive logic. This suggests that, at least in conjoined texts but perhaps in a contemporary mediated.
To reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. 15 16 INTRODUCTION of performance, Butler offers perhaps the most extensive examination of gender and performance, noting that gender is not just an act or performance but is materially performative. Butler’s distinction describes the manner in which gender is a fictionalized rather than fixed ontology. Gender, she asserts, is “the reiterative and citational practice by which discourse produces the effects it names” (1993, p. 2).