In Defense of Flogging

In Defense of Flogging

Peter Moskos

Language: English

Pages: 183

ISBN: 0465021484

Format: PDF / Kindle (mobi) / ePub


Prisons impose tremendous costs, yet they're easily ignored. Criminals-- even low-level nonviolent offenders-- enter our dysfunctional criminal justice system and disappear into a morass that's safely hidden from public view. Our "tough on crime" political rhetoric offers us no way out, and prison reformers are too quickly dismissed as soft on criminals. Meanwhile, the taxpayer picks up the extraordinary and unnecessary bill.

In Defense of Flogging presents a solution both radical and simple: give criminals a choice between incarceration and the lash. Flogging is punishment: quick, cheap, and honest.

Noted criminologist Peter Moskos, in irrefutable style, shows the logic of the new system while highlighting flaws in the status quo. Flogging may be cruel, but In Defense of Flogging shows us that compared to our broken prison system, it is the lesser of two evils.

Héroes, machos y patriotas: El fútbol entre la violencia y los medios

The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger

Climate Matters: Ethics in a Warming World (Norton Global Ethics Series)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well that slaves wouldn’t be allowed to vote, were the ones who disingenuously advocated full representation because any “representation” given to slaves would immediately pass into their masters’ hands. Think about it: Under the Three-Fifths Rule, one man with five slaves held the political representation of four people (five, if you count his disenfranchised wife). After the first census in the United States, in 1790, Maine and Massachusetts were the only slave-free states. One in five.

Point. Indeed, flogging might even help illuminate racial injustice already present in the criminal justice system. When you enter any jail or prison in the United States you’ll likely face a sea of black and brown faces. One can assume that the racial makeup of those being caned would be similar. But the inequities present in the status quo are not at all worsened by offering a choice of punishment. If you’re not convinced, think of the inverse. What if we currently had a system of flogging but.

Budget of the New York City Police Department is $4.4 billion. 17 foreign immigrants moved to New York City: The Newest New Yorkers 2000: Immigrant New York in the New Millennium (New York: New York City Department of City Planning, Population Division, 2004), 8, 10. 23 death penalty still runs three to one: Unpublished data graciously provided by Angus Reid Public Opinion, December 2010. Support for the death penalty among those who believe the death penalty does not deter crime is 73 percent.

Recidivism Rates of Felony Offenders: A Focus on Drug Offenders,” Criminology 40 (2002), 329–58; Joan Petersilia and Susan Turner, “Prison Versus Probation in California: Implications for Crime and Offender Recidivism” (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1986). 63 into self-sufficient criminal creators: Martin H. Pritikin, “Is Prison Increasing Crime?” Wisconsin Law Review, no. 6 (2008), 1049. 63 high school diploma do time in prison: Bruce Western, Punishment and Inequality in America (New York: Russell.

Crime rate and drug addiction and need to incapacitate vs. punishment See also Prison Incarceration rate among immigrants for blacks in Canada in China crime rate and in Cuba in Iran in Japan “natural” in North Korea in Russia in Rwanda in Singapore socioeconomic class and in United States war on drugs and of whites Indeterminate sentencing Ingraham v. Wright Institutionalization Intensive parole supervision Intermediate sanctions “In the Penal Colony” (Kafka) Iran,.

Download sample

Download